Some time ago I wrote, that Lightroom is a very nice program, but with some serious flaws that made me decide not to use. So now I’ve changed my mind, and decided to make Lightroom the hub of my digital workflow. How come?

Because Lightroom offers me 85% of what I need in one integrated package. First of all it’s a very capable photo-database with nice features for sorting, tagging, etc. Secondly it is an excellent RAW-converter. Furthermore it offers basic photo-editing, based on the idea of non-destructive editing. Finally it’s all wrapped up in a rather nice and functional user interface.

Apparently the developers at Adobe have done some serious case studies of the workflow of pro-photographers. The result is a program which – unlike Photoshop – is very “photocentric”.

How about the flaws then? Well of course they are still there. I hope that Adobe will include both the “save to web” as well as the “proof colors” that we know from Photoshop in the next version of Lightroom. And from some of the forums on the net, it seems like I’m not the only one with that hope…

Until this hope is fulfilled, there are basically two options when it comes to generate JPG’s for the web: Either learn to live with the limitations of Lightroom.  Or export to Photoshop and save as JPG from there. The last option is in fact made rather easy, since it is possible to make an export-preset in Lightroom that will scale your photo to preselected dimensions, save it as uncompressed JPG and automatically open it in Photoshop – all at one click. I like to see this as turning Photoshop into a save-to-web plug-in for Lightroom ;-)

Then there is the issue of speed. I’ve tweaked the preview options a bit – and then I decided to replace my aging AMD CPU with a never duo-core version. That helped. The time Lightroom takes to generate larger previews are still noticeable – but not more than I can live with it.

Lightroom is Adobes newest photo-handling software. It is based on at least two very good ideas: firstly, its meant to be a complete, integrated package for a digital workflow. It’s packing a RAW-converter, a picture-database, basic editing and several other functions into one program, with a very nice and functional user interface. Secondly, it’s based on the idea of non-destructive editing: no matter the amount of tweaking and editing you perform, Lightroom will not change one single pixel in your original image. Instead, it saves all your work in either an accompanying text-file or simply in the database. This also means that re-editing and creation of different versions is easy and flexible.

Lightroom

Lightrooms interface takes a little time to get used to. But in fact it works well – and looks good.

However, the program is let down by three serious problems: first of all it is painfully slow when it comes to scrolling in the library. Rendering thumbnails takes forever. It could be my machine – even though other similar programs are running at much higher speed on the same machine. It could also be that I have simply not found out how to best set up Lightroom for maximum speed.

The second problem has to do with the way Lightroom handles colours. Internally, it always uses the prophoto RGB colour-space and all editing is in 16bit. Not before a photo is send to its final destination, this is changed. If, for example, you export to JPG, it will be changed to 8 bit sRGB. This is not in itself a bad idea. However, contrary to the “Proof” function in Photoshop, there is no way to preview the result. You just have to hope that your colours won’t change too much.

The third problem also has to do with JPG export. Unlike other Adobe products, there is no preview of the effects of the compression you apply. You can only chose an amount and cross your fingers. Furthermore, since the photo can be downscaled in size only during the conversion to JPG, you can only apply sharpening on the full size version of the photo. Again, you just have to hold your breath and hope it will look all right, even if the final photo is much smaller.

The end result is that exporting to JPG becomes a tiresome process of trial and error, if youinsist on the best possible quality.

This is so much more annoying, since most of these problems could be easily solved with features such as “Proof” and “Save to web” which are already part of Photoshop. If Adobe will include these features in a later version of Lightroom, it will probably become my first choice for most of my photo-handling – even if it requires a hardware update. But for now I’ve decided to skip it in favour of other solutions.

Lars K. Christensen Credits